Matteo Viola vs Adrien Bossel Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W L W L L
Form
L L W W L L W W W LCara A Cara: Viola 2 - 1 Bossel
Ellas han jugado 6 conjuntos en total, con Viola victoriosa 4 y Bossel victoriosa 2. El último partido entre Viola y Bossel fue en el Meknes Challenger, el 09-09-2015, Cuartos de Second, Clay, con Matteo Viola obteniendo la victoria 7-6(0) 6-3
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matteo Viola | 2 |
| Adrien Bossel | 1 |
Meknes Challenger(09-09-2015)
7
6
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Lys PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(0) 6-3 |
Stats 
Matteo Viola
Player
Adrien Bossel
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Adrien Bossel
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Partidos cara a cara | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Ganados | 2 |
| 33 | Juegos Ganados | 26 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 5 | Faltas dobles totales | 8 |
| 0:48:56 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 0:48:56 |
| 59% (66/111) | % De Primer Servicio | 53% (60/113) |
| 71% (47/66) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 65% (39/60) |
| 56% (25/45) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 34% (18/53) |
| 75% (9/12) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 50% (56/113) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 35% (39/111) |
| 67% (2/3) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (2/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Matteo Viola
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Matteo Viola
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Omar Giacalone
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Matteo Viola
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Pavel Nejedly
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Matteo Viola
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Matteo Viola
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Matteo Viola
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Adrien Bossel
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Adrien Bossel
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
13
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrien Bossel
Player
Mirko Martinez
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Nik Razborsek
Player
Adrien Bossel
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
72)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrien Bossel
Player
Anis Ghorbel
42%
(
38 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Harri Heliovaara
Player
Adrien Bossel
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Adrien Bossel
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
43%
(
37 of
86)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (563/490) | Win/Loss | 55% (381/314) |
| 53% (1293/1169) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (878/737) |
| 51% (11695/11015) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8090/7529) |
| 59% (119/82) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (115/78) |
| 53% (344/300) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (71/74) |
| 49% (93/97) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (174/144) |
| 39% (7/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (21/18) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1006 | Aces Total | 1854 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 2685 | Total Double Faults | 1008 |
| 1:1:45 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 569.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 102.74 |
| 66% (32316/49106) | 1st Serve % | 55% (11572/20886) |
| 63% (20444/32316) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (8551/11572) |
| 46% (7794/16790) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4629/9314) |
| 45% (2453/5479) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (610/1610) |
| 43% (20688/48079) | Return Points Win % | 36% (7352/20605) |
| 33% (13/26) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 29% (5/12) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 51% (36/35) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (16/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (232/257) | Challenger W/L | 51% (106/101) |
| 63% (277/160) | Futures W/L | 58% (259/187) |
| 53% (554/1036) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (372/683) |
| 33% (3/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 51% (138/268) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (157/288) |
| 52% (186/355) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (108/231) |
| 83% (539/450) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (378/318) |
| 16% (539/88) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (378/60) |
| 22% (514/112) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (317/61) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
